Background
Although Pennsylvania’s Nutrient Management Act has been
in effect for a decade, the pollution of Pennsylvania’s lakes,
rivers and streams and the Chesapeake Bay from nutrient-laden runoff
continues to be a serious problem. DEP estimates that 3,903 miles
of the Commonwealth’s streams, in addition to downstream water
bodies such as the Chesapeake Bay, are impaired by agricultural
impacts.
Under the Nutrient Management Act, review of the regulations is
mandated to occur every five years, but regulatory revisions are
also sorely needed to address the shortcomings and loopholes in
the regulations. The State Conservation Commission (SCC) is taking
comments from the public on the proposed revisions.
Meanwhile, Pennsylvania must revise the existing CAFO regulations
to bring them up to at least the standard of new federal Clean Water
Act regulations for CAFOs finalized under the Bush administration.
Sierra Club believes that CAFOs represent a flawed and unsustainable
animal production model, with the potential to be highly polluting.
Establishing strong regulations that will discourage CAFOs from
using cheap and dirty production methods that pollute the air and
water, and also undermine small-scale, more sustainable operations,
is a priority for the Club.
We have serious concerns about several of the voids and weaknesses
in DEP’s proposed revisions to the CAFO regulations. These
concerns essentially fall into two categories:
- Which operations are defined as CAFOs?
- What are they required, and not required, to do?
Click here to return to Where to send
comments page
Click here to read the proposed CAFO
definitions
Click here to read the proposed CAFO permit
requirements
Click here to read about proposed changes
to Nutrient Management Regulations
Up to Top
Sierra Club® and "Explore,
enjoy and protect the planet."® are registered trademarks
of the Sierra Club.
All content on this website is governed by a Creative
Commons license. |